Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salva Valero

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:48, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Salva Valero

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Youth coaching positions do not qualify him for WP:NFOOTBALL. In terms of coverage in independent WP:RS, I could only find a passing mention in AS. In my searches I found a blog post written by Valero himself and this Thai Footie blog post. We should ignore the source written by him and I don't think that the other blog post is enough for WP:GNG on its own. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:31, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:31, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:31, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:31, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:33, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:55, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 10:24, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom, I just wanted to wait for presenting more refs, but indeed fails WP:GNG and NFOOTBALL CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:09, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 13:14, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not enough in-depth sourcing to pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:17, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 16:21, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG. Sonofstar (talk) 19:55, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.